Re: acpi_device->driver_data vs acpi_device->dev.driver_data

[Werner Sembach <wse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 21.11.24 um 22:53 schrieb Armin Wolf:
> Am 19.11.24 um 17:43 schrieb Werner Sembach:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > another quick learning question: Why does the acpi_device struct have
> > a driver_data member in addition to the driver_data member of the
> > nested dev?
> >
> > What should each driver_data member be used for?
> >
> > In contrast platform_device and wmi_device only have the
> > dev.driver_data and not the top level driver data.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Werner Sembach
> Hi,
>
> from my point of view the driver_data member inside the acpi_device struct is 
> deprecated. You should use dev_set/get_drvdata()
> instead. Other than that the semantics are the same (i think).

Thanks, will do

Kind regards,

Werner

> Thanks,
> Armin Wolf