Am 31.10.24 um 05:09 schrieb Mario Limonciello:
As support for multiple simultaneous platform handers is introduced it's
important they have at least the balanced profile in common.
This will be used as a fallback in case setting the profile across one of the
handlers happens to fail.
Do we actually need this patch anymore now that we have the "custom" platform profile?
If setting the platform profile fails for some handlers, then we simply display the current
platform profile as "custom".
Thanks,
Armin Wolf
Tested-by: Matthew Schwartz <matthew.schwartz@xxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
index b70ceb11947d0..57c66d7dbf827 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
@@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ int platform_profile_register(struct platform_profile_handler *pprof)
pr_err("platform_profile: handler is invalid\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (!test_bit(PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED, pprof->choices)) {
+ pr_err("platform_profile: handler does not support balanced profile\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
if (!pprof->dev) {
pr_err("platform_profile: handler device is not set\n");
return -EINVAL;
