Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86/tuxedo: Add virtual LampArray for TUXEDO NB04 devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 11.10.24 um 17:26 schrieb Pavel Machek:

Hi!

1.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/6b32fb73-0544-4a68-95ba-e82406a4b188@xxxxxx/
-> Should be no problem? Because this is not generally exposing wmi
calls, just mapping two explicitly with sanitized input (whitelisting
basically).
It would be OK to expose a selected set of WMI calls to userspace and sanitizing the input of protect potentially buggy firmware from userspace.

I don't believe this is good idea. Passthrough interfaces where
userland talks directly to hardware are very tricky.

Regarding the basic idea of having a virtual HID interface: i would prefer to create a illumination subsystem instead, but i have to agree that we should be doing this
only after enough drivers are inside the kernel, so we can design a
suitable interface for them. For now, creating a virtual HID
interface seems to be good enough.
I have an RGB keyboard, and would like to get it supported. I already
have kernel driver for LEDs (which breaks input functionality). I'd
like to cooperate on "illumination" subsystem.

Best regards,
								Pavel

Sorry for taking a bit long to respond.

This "illumination" subsystem would (from my perspective) act like some sort of LED subsystem
for devices with a high count of LEDs, like some RGB keyboards.

This would allow us too:
- provide an abstract interface for userspace applications like OpenRGB
- provide an generic LED subsystem emulation on top of the illumination device (optional)
- support future RGB controllers in a generic way

Advanced features like RGB effects, etc can be added later should the need arise.

I would suggest that we model it after the HID LampArray interface:

- interface for querying:
 - number of LEDs
 - supported colors, etc of those LEDs
 - position of those LEDs if available
 - kind (keyboard, ...)
 - latency, etc
- interface for setting multiple LEDs at once
- interface for setting a range of LEDs at once
- interface for getting the current LED colors

Since sysfs has a "one value per file" rule, i suggest that we use a chardev interface
for querying per-LED data and for setting/getting LED colors.

I do not know if mixing sysfs (for controller attributes like number of LEDs, etc) and IOCTL
(for setting/getting LED colors) is a good idea, any thoughts?

Thanks,
Armin Wolf





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux