There is a spelling mistake of 'ACCCESS_LOCAL' which should be instead of 'ACCESS_LOCAL'. Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c index c04bb7f97a4d..7680474c4f96 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int intel_pmt_populate_entry(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry, /* * Some hardware use a different calculation for the base address * when access_type == ACCESS_LOCAL. On the these systems - * ACCCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the + * ACCESS_LOCAL refers to an address in the same BAR as the * header but at a fixed offset. But as the header address was * supplied to the driver, we don't know which BAR it was in. * So search for the bar whose range includes the header address. -- 2.45.2
