On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 11:31:53AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Hi Andy, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/driver-core-Ignore-0-in-dev_err_probe/20240826-113856 > base: driver-core/driver-core-testing > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822130722.1261891-3-andriy.shevchenko%40linux.intel.com > patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] platform/x86: int3472: Simplify dev_err_probe() usage > config: i386-randconfig-141-20240830 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240831/202408310807.sNPe5Mr2-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202408310807.sNPe5Mr2-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > smatch warnings: > drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c:292 skl_int3472_handle_gpio_resources() error: uninitialized symbol 'err_msg'. > drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c:292 skl_int3472_handle_gpio_resources() warn: passing zero to 'dev_err_probe' Okay, I might agree on the err_msg, which is good to have to be passed anyway. In such a case it might be good to have a dev_dbg() in the dev_err_probe() to say that it is likely a bug in the code. Would you accept that approach? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
