On Thu, 30 May 2024, Chang S. Bae wrote: > This revision switches to a new approach by providing a helper to > initialize user FPU states for the driver, which is considerably simpler. > This approach could serve as an example for addressing similar situations > from a non-critical path. > > I thought fpu_reset_fpregs() as the helper name. There is already one > with this name. Then, I realized the existing one is a bit misaligned, so > renamed it first here. > > Thanks to Dave for the reviews and the suggestion. > > Thanks, > Chang > > The previous postings: > V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240507235344.249103-1-chang.seok.bae@xxxxxxxxx > V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240430212508.105117-1-chang.seok.bae@xxxxxxxxx > > Chang S. Bae (3): > x86/fpu: Rename fpu_reset_fpregs() to fpu_reset_fpstate_regs() > x86/fpu: Allow FPU users to initialize FPU state > platform/x86/intel/ifs: Initialize FPU states for the scan test > > arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h | 2 ++ > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- > drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h | 1 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c | 7 +++++++ > 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Acked-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Do x86 maintainers plan to take these through their tree? -- i.
