On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:07 AM Ilpo Järvinen > <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Apr 2024, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > > send_acpi_ev, ignore_acpi_ev are already initialized to true resp. false by > > > > Wording here is odd (but I'm not native so could be I just don't > > understand what "true resp. false" is supposed to mean/fit into the > > general structure of this sentence). I could nonetheless guess the > > general meaning of the sentence despite that, but you might want to > > consider rewording it into something that is easier to understand. > > I read that as "true and false respectively", which is probably better That's what I expected to see (although with a comma before respectively). Looking a bit more into it, it seems the placement in the middle is probably an artifact from another language (claimed to not be correct English): https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/resp. > to be spelled this way. -- i.
