Re: [PATCH V3 8/9] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Simplify ascii printing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 20:22 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, David E. Box wrote:
> 
> > Use printf width specifier to set the display length of encoded feature
> > names.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
> > <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> > V3 - Add FEAT_LEN #def
> > 
> > V2 - Split of V1 patch 7
> > 
> >  tools/arch/x86/intel_sdsi/intel_sdsi.c | 13 ++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/intel_sdsi/intel_sdsi.c
> > b/tools/arch/x86/intel_sdsi/intel_sdsi.c
> > index 45bc69e6718e..0c9670ba1f15 100644
> > --- a/tools/arch/x86/intel_sdsi/intel_sdsi.c
> > +++ b/tools/arch/x86/intel_sdsi/intel_sdsi.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> >  #define METER_CERT_MAX_SIZE	4096
> >  #define STATE_MAX_NUM_LICENSES	16
> >  #define STATE_MAX_NUM_IN_BUNDLE	(uint32_t)8
> > +#define FEAT_LEN		4
> >  
> >  #define __round_mask(x, y) ((__typeof__(x))((y) - 1))
> >  #define round_up(x, y) ((((x) - 1) | __round_mask(x, y)) + 1)
> > @@ -409,11 +410,10 @@ static int sdsi_meter_cert_show(struct sdsi_dev *s)
> >  
> >  	printf("Number of Feature Counters:   %ld\n", BUNDLE_COUNT(mc-
> > >bundle_length));
> >  	while (count < BUNDLE_COUNT(mc->bundle_length)) {
> > -		char feature[5];
> > +		char feature[FEAT_LEN];
> >  
> > -		feature[4] = '\0';
> >  		get_feature(bec[count].encoding, feature);
> > -		printf("    %s:          %d\n", feature,
> > bec[count].counter);
> > +		printf("    %.4s:          %d\n", feature,
> > bec[count].counter);
> >  		++count;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static int sdsi_state_cert_show(struct sdsi_dev *s)
> >  			sizeof(*lki) +			// size of the
> > license key info
> >  			offset;				// offset
> > to this blob content
> >  		struct bundle_encoding *bundle = (void *)(lbc) +
> > sizeof(*lbc);
> > -		char feature[5];
> > +		char feature[FEAT_LEN];
> >  		uint32_t i;
> >  
> >  		printf("     Blob %d:\n", count - 1);
> > @@ -507,11 +507,9 @@ static int sdsi_state_cert_show(struct sdsi_dev *s)
> >  		printf("        Blob revision ID:           %u\n", lbc-
> > >rev_id);
> >  		printf("        Number of Features:         %u\n", lbc-
> > >num_bundles);
> >  
> > -		feature[4] = '\0';
> > -
> >  		for (i = 0; i < min(lbc->num_bundles,
> > STATE_MAX_NUM_IN_BUNDLE); i++) {
> >  			get_feature(bundle[i].encoding, feature);
> > -			printf("                 Feature %d:         %s\n",
> > i, feature);
> > +			printf("                 Feature %d:        
> > %.4s\n", i, feature);
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		if (lbc->num_bundles > STATE_MAX_NUM_IN_BUNDLE)
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> After staring this for a while, I cannot get rid of the feeling that the 
> removal of NUL termination is a step into wrong direction. But IMO, 
> instead of the caller side, the NUL termination could be added inside 
> get_feature().

Yeah, you're right. I'll make this change.

David
> 






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux