Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: leds: add LED_FUNCTION_FNLOCK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 03/04/2024 10:39, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> must have a dts user before being approved too ? Since
>>> that file is included from include/dt-bindings/input/input.h ?
>> Wait, that's UAPI :) and we just share the constants. That's kind of
>> special case, but I get what you mean.
>>> TL;DR: not only is this patch fine, this is actually
>>> the correct place to add such a define according to
>>> the docs in Documentation/leds/leds-class.rst :
>>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks. Is it ok for me to merge this through the pdx86
> tree (once I've reviewed the other 2 patches) ?

You need to sync (ack) with LED folks, because by default this should go
via LED subsystem.

Best regards,

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux