Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Use acpi_has_method to check for switch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/29/24 7:32 AM, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
> To mimic how we check if the device has virtual buttons,
> acpi_has_method(..."VBDL"), use the same method for checking virtual
> switch presence.

if possible don't use words like we/I in the commit log.

Other wise, it looks fine.

Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c
> index 084c355c86f5f..48f0ac19d6ddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c
> @@ -258,9 +258,6 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id dmi_switches_allow_list[] = {
>  
>  static bool intel_vbtn_has_switches(acpi_handle handle, bool dual_accel)
>  {
> -	unsigned long long vgbs;
> -	acpi_status status;
> -
>  	/* See dual_accel_detect.h for more info */
>  	if (dual_accel)
>  		return false;
> @@ -268,8 +265,7 @@ static bool intel_vbtn_has_switches(acpi_handle handle, bool dual_accel)
>  	if (!dmi_check_system(dmi_switches_allow_list))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "VGBS", NULL, &vgbs);
> -	return ACPI_SUCCESS(status);
> +	return acpi_has_method(handle, "VGBS");
>  }
>  
>  static int intel_vbtn_probe(struct platform_device *device)

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux