Re: [PATCH] Fix to correct wrong temp reporting on some ThinkPads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, Vishnu Sankar wrote:

> Thanks a lot for the review.
> And sorry for the delay in response.

Small improvements to my earlier version below now that I reread it.

> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 8:03 PM Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -6174,6 +6191,21 @@ static int thermal_get_sensor(int idx, s32 *value)
...
>       A code reader would be served much better if this convoluted logic is
>       simplied to:
> 
>               case TPACPI_THERMAL_TPEC_12:
>                       if (idx >= 12)
>                               return -EINVAL;
> 
>                       if (idx <= 7)

if (idx < 8) 	<- to match idx - 8

>                               ec_offset = TP_EC_THERMAL_TMP0_NS + idx;
>                       else
>                               ec_offset = TP_EC_THERMAL_TMP8_NS + (idx - 8);
> 
>                       if (!acpi_ec_read(ec_offset, &tmp))
>                               return -EIO;
> 
>                       *value = tmp * 1000;

1000 should likely be something from linux/units.h.


-- 
 i.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux