On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 16:30 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, David E. Box wrote: > > > Add auto-release cleanups for iounmap() and ioport_unmap(). > > > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > V2 - Move from linux/io.h to asm-generic/io.h. Adds iounmap cleanup if > > iounmap() is defined. Adds ioport_unmap cleanup if CONFIG_IOPORT_MAP > > is defined. > > > > include/asm-generic/io.h | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h > > index bac63e874c7b..9ef0332490b1 100644 > > --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h > > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > > #define __ASM_GENERIC_IO_H > > > > #include <asm/page.h> /* I/O is all done through memory accesses */ > > +#include <linux/cleanup.h> > > #include <linux/string.h> /* for memset() and memcpy() */ > > #include <linux/types.h> > > #include <linux/instruction_pointer.h> > > @@ -1065,6 +1066,10 @@ static inline void __iomem *ioremap(phys_addr_t addr, > > size_t size) > > #endif > > #endif /* !CONFIG_MMU || CONFIG_GENERIC_IOREMAP */ > > > > +#ifdef iounmap > > +DEFINE_FREE(iounmap, void __iomem *, iounmap(_T)); > > +#endif > > + > > #ifndef ioremap_wc > > #define ioremap_wc ioremap > > #endif > > @@ -1127,6 +1132,7 @@ static inline void ioport_unmap(void __iomem *p) > > extern void __iomem *ioport_map(unsigned long port, unsigned int nr); > > extern void ioport_unmap(void __iomem *p); > > #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP */ > > +DEFINE_FREE(ioport_unmap, void __iomem *, ioport_unmap(_T)); > > #endif /* CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP */ > > > > #ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP > > Has this now built successfully with LKP? (I don't think we get success > notifications from LKP for patch submissions, only failures). I haven't received it yet and don't know when or if I will. The build instructions are provided so I can attempt to check it myself. > > There were some odd errors last time but I think all they were unrelated > to this change (besides the checkpatch false positive, I mean). Indeed. I couldn't explain them either except to think maybe it was related to the implicit declaration warning. The implicit declaration warning was one that I did see in my build after rerunning with W=1 C=1. I usually always run with this but on V4 had done so only on the modules and forgot the bzImage. David >
