Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] platform/x86/intel/ifs: ARRAY BIST for Sierra Forest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, Jithu Joseph wrote:

> Array BIST MSR addresses, bit definition and semantics are different for
> Sierra Forest. Branch into a separate Array BIST flow on Sierra Forest
> when user invokes Array Test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h     |  7 +++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/core.c    | 15 +++++-----
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h
> index f0dd849b3400..2dd5e3406dac 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/ifs.h
> @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@
>  #define MSR_CHUNKS_AUTHENTICATION_STATUS	0x000002c5
>  #define MSR_ACTIVATE_SCAN			0x000002c6
>  #define MSR_SCAN_STATUS				0x000002c7
> +#define MSR_ARRAY_TRIGGER			0x000002d6
> +#define MSR_ARRAY_STATUS			0x000002d7
>  #define MSR_SAF_CTRL				0x000004f0
>  
>  #define SCAN_NOT_TESTED				0
> @@ -146,6 +148,9 @@
>  #define IFS_TYPE_SAF			0
>  #define IFS_TYPE_ARRAY_BIST		1
>  
> +#define ARRAY_GEN_0			0
> +#define ARRAY_GEN_1			1

Thank you for your contribution. I've applied this series to my local 
review-ilpo branch.

I ended up renaming these defines ARRAY_GEN_* -> ARRAY_GEN* to make
them more consistent.

-- 
 i.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux