Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] platform/x86/intel/pmc: core: Report duration of time in HW sleep state

["David E. Box" <david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 22:40 +0000, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> [Public]
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 04:24
> > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Box David E <david.e.box@xxxxxxxxx>; jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > pavel@xxxxxx; svenva@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Rajneesh Bhardwaj
> > <irenic.rajneesh@xxxxxxxxx>; S-k, Shyam-sundar <Shyam-sundar.S-
> > k@xxxxxxx>; rrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Jain Rajat <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> > hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx; Mark Gross <markgross@xxxxxxxxxx>; platform-
> > driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] platform/x86/intel/pmc: core: Report duration of
> > time in HW sleep state
> > 
> > On Wed, 12 Apr 2023, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > 
> > > intel_pmc_core displays a warning when the module parameter
> > > `warn_on_s0ix_failures` is set and a suspend didn't get to a HW sleep
> > > state.
> > > 
> > > Report this to the standard kernel reporting infrastructure so that
> > > userspace software can query after the suspend cycle is done.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v7->v8:
> > >  * Report max sleep as well
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> > b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> > > index 925c5d676a43..f9677104353d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> > > @@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ static int pmc_core_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > >         pmc_core_do_dmi_quirks(pmcdev);
> > > 
> > >         pmc_core_dbgfs_register(pmcdev);
> > > +       pm_report_max_hw_sleep(((1UL << 32) - 1) *
> > pmc_core_adjust_slp_s0_step(pmcdev, 1));
> > 
> > Technically this is FIELD_MAX(SLP_S0_RES_COUNTER_MASK) *
> > pmc_core_adjust...?
> > Where the define is:
> > #define SLP_S0_RES_COUNTER_MASK GENMASK(31, 0)
> 
> That's fine by me to switch it over, it certainly makes it a lot more
> readable.
> I took the value from @Box David E to use suggested in v7, so what are your
> thoughts?

Ilpo's suggestion is preferable. The warning comes from using 1UL, long being 4
bytes on i386.

> 
> The current version has an overflow error reported by the robot for i386, so
> it
> definitely needs some sort of change.

Resolved by using the macro. With Ilpo's suggestion you can add my reviewed by.
Thanks.

David

> 
> > 
> > > 
> > >         device_initialized = true;
> > >         dev_info(&pdev->dev, " initialized\n");
> > > @@ -1214,6 +1215,8 @@ static inline bool pmc_core_is_s0ix_failed(struct
> > pmc_dev *pmcdev)
> > >         if (pmc_core_dev_state_get(pmcdev, &s0ix_counter))
> > >                 return false;
> > > 
> > > +       pm_report_hw_sleep_time((u32)(s0ix_counter - pmcdev-
> > > s0ix_counter));
> > > +
> > >         if (s0ix_counter == pmcdev->s0ix_counter)
> > >                 return true;
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> >  i.