On 2023-03-27 15:15:06+0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On 3/25/23 17:48, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > Having to maintain a per-system allowlist is burdensome and confusing > > for users, drop it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > I propose to keep this in -next for two cycles or so to make sure it > > does not break anything. > > I think dropping this is a good idea (given the current experience with > the driver), but keeping the dropping of the list in -next for 2 cycles > is somewhat tricky. Normally once the final e.g. 6.3 is released I take > the pdx86/for-next branch *as-is* and use that to send a pull-req to > Linus, so that Linus gets send a hash which has been tested in linux-next > for a while before sending it to him. > > Dropping this patch at that point would mean generating a new hash, > which is a bit meh. I can do that but I would prefer to just limit > testing to 1 full cycle. > > Maybe you can send me a non RFC version of this patch once 6.4-rc1 is out? > Then I can add that to for-next right away and then we can get a full > cycle of -next testing that way. > > Would that work for you? Absolutely, will do. Thanks, Thomas
