Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] platform/x86: think-lmi: Add possible_values for ThinkStation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 01:59:38PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2023, at 12:35 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > please also CC linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and previous reviewers.
> My apologies on previous reviewers - that was a miss on my behalf
> I've never cc'd linux-kernel previously - is that a requirement? It's
> new to me if it is - what's the reason? (that mailing list seems
> unusable to me from my limited experience...)

The wording in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst is indeed
unclear about always Cc'ing linux-kernel.

My arguments for it are:

- People can look at the linux-kernel archives to see what's going on
  all over the kernel.  (I do that sometimes myself)
  Also it makes it easier to search on on linux-specific
  messages/patches. The /all/ archives also contains other projects.

- Some bots are processing proposed patches from mailing lists.
  These are not subscribed to all subsystem lists.

- The b4 tool does it.

- Greg does it:


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux