Tested on a couple of my platforms - all looked good. Tested-by: mpearson-lenovo@xxxxxxxxx Mark On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, at 10:44 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/12/23 04:47, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >> The return value of tlmi_settings() is an errorcode, not an acpi_status. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans > branch: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans > > Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my > local branch there, which might take a while. > > Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be > added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually > will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next > merge-window. > > Regards, > > Hans > > >> --- >> >> Note: This is only compile-tested. >> --- >> drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 5 ++--- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c >> index 86b33b74519b..c924e9e4a6a5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c >> @@ -1353,7 +1353,6 @@ static struct tlmi_pwd_setting *tlmi_create_auth(const char *pwd_type, >> >> static int tlmi_analyze(void) >> { >> - acpi_status status; >> int i, ret; >> >> if (wmi_has_guid(LENOVO_SET_BIOS_SETTINGS_GUID) && >> @@ -1390,8 +1389,8 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void) >> char *p; >> >> tlmi_priv.setting[i] = NULL; >> - status = tlmi_setting(i, &item, LENOVO_BIOS_SETTING_GUID); >> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) >> + ret = tlmi_setting(i, &item, LENOVO_BIOS_SETTING_GUID); >> + if (ret) >> break; >> if (!item) >> break; >> >> --- >> base-commit: 81ff855485a366a391dc3aed3942715e676ed132 >> change-id: 20230312-think-lmi-status-0d76cbe1b7d9 >> >> Best regards,
