Hi Dongliang,
>
...
...
> Hi Srinivas and Hans,
>
> How about folding these three patches into one patch and resend a v3
> patch?
>
> This will get all people together and avoid the previous embarrassing
> sitation.
This is NOT an embarrassing situation.
Thanks for finding and fixing the issue.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> Dongliang Mu
>
> >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hans
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c | 17 ++++-------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
> > > > b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
> > > > index c999732b0f1e..882fe5e4763f 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
> > > > @@ -215,8 +215,8 @@ static int tpmi_create_device(struct
> > > > intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info,
> > > >
> > > > feature_vsec_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*feature_vsec_dev),
> > > > GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > if (!feature_vsec_dev) {
> > > > - ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > > - goto free_res;
> > > > + kfree(res);
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > snprintf(feature_id_name, sizeof(feature_id_name),
> > > > "tpmi-
> > > > %s", name);
> > > > @@ -242,17 +242,8 @@ static int tpmi_create_device(struct
> > > > intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info,
> > > > * feature_vsec_dev memory is also freed as part of
> > > > device
> > > > * delete.
> > > > */
> > > > - ret = intel_vsec_add_aux(vsec_dev->pcidev, &vsec_dev-
> > > > > auxdev.dev,
> > > > - feature_vsec_dev,
> > > > feature_id_name);
> > > > - if (ret)
> > > > - goto free_res;
> > > > -
> > > > - return 0;
> > > > -
> > > > -free_res:
> > > > - kfree(res);
> > > > -
> > > > - return ret;
> > > > + return intel_vsec_add_aux(vsec_dev->pcidev, &vsec_dev-
> > > > > auxdev.dev,
> > > > + feature_vsec_dev,
> > > > feature_id_name);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static int tpmi_create_devices(struct intel_tpmi_info
> > > > *tpmi_info)
