Hi Kate,
On 2/13/23 13:45, Kate Hsuan wrote:
> Add MFD cell for tps68470-led.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kate Hsuan <hpa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/tps68470.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/tps68470.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/tps68470.c
> index 5b8d1a9620a5..9dceb6507a01 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/tps68470.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/tps68470.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> #define DESIGNED_FOR_CHROMEOS 1
> #define DESIGNED_FOR_WINDOWS 2
>
> -#define TPS68470_WIN_MFD_CELL_COUNT 3
> +#define TPS68470_WIN_MFD_CELL_COUNT 4
>
> static const struct mfd_cell tps68470_cros[] = {
> { .name = "tps68470-gpio" },
> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int skl_int3472_tps68470_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> cells[1].platform_data = (void *)board_data->tps68470_regulator_pdata;
> cells[1].pdata_size = sizeof(struct tps68470_regulator_platform_data);
> cells[2].name = "tps68470-gpio";
> + cells[3].name = "tps68470-led";
As the comment a few lines above states, the gpio cell must be last because the GPIO
driver ends up calling acpi_dev_clear_dependencies() which will cause the ACPI code
to instantiate the i2c_client-s for the camera sensors and we want all the cells
to be instantiated before this happens, so this needs to become:
cells[2].name = "tps68470-led";
cells[3].name = "tps68470-gpio";
And for the sensor to actually be able to use the LEDA output as privacy LED,
we also need to add a led lookup-table entry linking the sensor and the LEDA
LED-class-device. I'll write a patch for this and submit that upstream soonish.
For v2 of this patch-set, please include my patch with the lookup as a 4th patch.
Regards,
Hans
>
> for (i = 0; i < board_data->n_gpiod_lookups; i++)
> gpiod_add_lookup_table(board_data->tps68470_gpio_lookup_tables[i]);
