Re: [PATCH 1/6] media: ov5693: Add support for a privacy-led GPIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 1:50 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:21:12PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > On 12/2/22 11:54, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

...

> > Note the need for an index -> name map is standard for all GPIOs
> > on ACPI platforms.
>
> It's funny how ARM platforms were criticized for their need of board
> files, with x86/ACPI being revered as a saint. Now we have DT on ARM and
> x86 needs board files :-)

I believe it's a misunderstanding here due to missing words at Hans'
statement, i..e.
"..., which do not provide the descriptions in _DSD() method."

So, no, x86 does not need board files generally speaking. The problem
here is some departments of some big companies that didn't get ACPI
properly or at all.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux