https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216516 --- Comment #15 from kolAflash (kolAflash@xxxxxxxxxxxx) --- I booted the Kubuntu-22.10 beta which comes with linux-5.19 (ran the live image from USB storage). And the power consumption was at about 2 % per hour. The kernel is pretty much the same to what I'm using with openSUSE, so in some way the userspace must make a difference. At least in the way the userspace configures the kernel via sysfs. Then I went back to my openSUSE-15.4 system, running the linux-6.0-rc6 kernel I compiled. And I disabled all sysfs wakeup triggers from userspace. find /sys/devices/ -type f -name wakeup -exec bash -c 'echo disabled > "{}"' \; And indeed, power usage went down to 2 % per hour! :-) So should I open a bug for s2idle in openSUSE instead!? I also tried other Linux distros a kernel >= 5.19. But I couldn't get the s2idle power usage significantly below 2 % per hour. So S3 is still about 4 times better with around 0.5 % battery usage per hour. Tomorrow I'm planning to do the debugging steps described by Mario in comment #14. So maybe with that the consumption can be brought further down for s2idle. But I also still the idea of using S3 (especially because of the very low power consumption). ---> So I'd still like to see a fix for the commit initially mentioned. Or maybe not a fix, but a kernel command line option to disable that behavior. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=7123d39dc24dcd21ff23d75f46f926b15269b9da -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.