On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:04:37AM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote:
> At present, the tps68470.c only supports a single clock consumer when
> passing platform data to the clock driver. In some devices multiple
> sensors depend on the clock provided by a single TPS68470 and so all
> need to be able to acquire the clock. Support passing multiple
> consumers as platform data.
...
> +static int
> +skl_int3472_fill_clk_pdata(struct device *dev, struct tps68470_clk_platform_data **clk_pdata)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> + struct acpi_device *consumer;
> + unsigned int n_consumers = 0;
> + const char *sensor_name;
> + unsigned int i = 0;
> +
> + for_each_acpi_consumer_dev(adev, consumer)
> + n_consumers++;
Here no put for consumer (and IIUC it's correct).
> +
(Also no need to have a blank line here, the condition is tighten to
the for-loop.)
> + if (!n_consumers) {
> + dev_err(dev, "INT3472 seems to have no dependents\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + *clk_pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(*clk_pdata, consumers, n_consumers),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!*clk_pdata)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + (*clk_pdata)->n_consumers = n_consumers;
> + i = 0;
> +
> + for_each_acpi_consumer_dev(adev, consumer) {
> + sensor_name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT,
> + acpi_dev_name(consumer));
> + if (!sensor_name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + (*clk_pdata)->consumers[i].consumer_dev_name = sensor_name;
> + i++;
> + }
> + acpi_dev_put(consumer);
Why is it here?
> + return n_consumers;
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
