Hi 2022. szeptember 12., hétfő 19:29 keltezéssel, Armin Wolf <W_Armin@xxxxxx> írta: > Am 12.09.22 um 18:42 schrieb Barnabás Pőcze: > > > Hi > > > > 2022. szeptember 12., hétfő 14:53 keltezéssel, Armin Wolf írta: > > > > > Registering multiple instances of a battery hook is beneficial > > > for drivers which can be instantiated multiple times. Until now, > > > this would mean that such a driver would have to implement some > > > logic to manage battery hooks. > > > > > > Extend the battery hook handling instead. > > > I think this is already possible by embedding the acpi_battery_hook > > > object inside the driver's device specific data object, no? > > > > Regards, > > Barnabás Pőcze > > Yes, it indeed is. However afaik it is not possible to pass instance-specific > data to such an embedded battery hook. It could be possible by passing the > battery hook as an argument to add_battery()/remove_battery() and using container_of(), > but in my opinion this would be too much of a quick hack. Good point about the instance-specific data. However, regarding the second point, I am with Hans. I do not really think it is that big of a hack. It is inheritance. Regards, Barnabás Pőcze
