On 9/2/2022 1:55 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 9/1/22 19:32, Kammela, Gayatri wrote:
On 9/1/2022 8:47 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 9/1/22 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 8/30/22 20:20, Gayatri Kammela wrote:
Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core
driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs.
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Box <david.e.box@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
In file included from drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:29:
./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:46: error: ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_P’?
161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:46:27: note: in definition of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_STEPPINGS_FEATURE’
46 | .model = _model, \
| ^~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE’
129 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family, model, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h:161:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL’
161 | X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, data)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c:1918:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL’
1918 | X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:249: drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.o] Error 1
And dropped again, please upstream this through the tree which also has the new
INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE* macros.
Here is my Acked-by for merging this through another tree:
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Hans
Hi Hans!
Thank you for your Acked-by! The cpuid patch has been merged in to v6.0-rc3. I am not sure why its complaining about INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE_S being undeclared.
patch - ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 : "x86/cpu: Add new Raptor Lake CPU model number".
I made sure its built without errors before sending it out.
Ah I see, but my tree (like most trees) is based on 6.0-rc1,
please submit this patch to the same tree as through which
ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 went upstream,
with my Acked-by added.
Thanks,
Hans
Hi Hans!
I did send v2 based on review-hans branch with dependency patch
included. Sorry for the delay and thank you!
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
index a1fe1e0dcf4a..17ec5825d13d 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
@@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = {
X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N, &tgl_reg_map),
X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE, &adl_reg_map),
X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_P, &tgl_reg_map),
+ X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE, &adl_reg_map),
+ X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(RAPTORLAKE_S, &adl_reg_map),
{}
};
base-commit: b90cb1053190353cc30f0fef0ef1f378ccc063c5
