On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 11:33 AM Luke Jones <luke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 6 2022 at 11:10:37 +0200, Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 10:20 AM Luke D. Jones <luke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There are so many patches > > This is what Hans requested that I do after the previous submissions, No, what I'm referring to is that it was so many versions of the same patch(es) that are floating around and it's too messy to understand which version is which and what to consider. > > and versioning of all of this is completely > > broken. > > I was unsure how to handle this as the previous patches were > individual, I thought perhaps this patch series is a good place to > restart since the work done is a bit different. > > I will try to better track what I do in future. Thanks! > > You really have to clean up the mess and realize what version > > of this is. To me it looks like this series is v5 or so of the > > previously sent patch(es). Also you missed the changelog between > > versions so we can see what you have done from vX to vX+1 for the > > whole range (1 ... X+1). > > As described before I thought this would hopefully be a good point at > which to reset due to the changes requested by Hans which meant that > the underlying structure is different. > > I do have another version already prepped, so I will do my best to > address the previous submissions and your concerns in the cover letter > along with a changelog. Thanks. For the less confusion continue this versioning than (v2 will be the next one for the series). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
