https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216230 --- Comment #8 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx) --- > Although I'm afraid it won't be very interesting. It might not be, but once we know the timing relative to pinctrl-amd loading we can know if it's that. If it's not, then our next step will be to crank up ACPI debugging output to see if it correlates with an ACPI event. > Okay. Would adding pinctrl_amd to initramfs be enough to rule out this > possibility? Yeah that or compiling it as built-in. > I'm aware but I've been using this machine with forced ASPM for about 2 years > with no apparent issues related to that. I'll give it a go. I guess the reason you do it is for improved power consumption. I think you should contrast how much you save with a watt meter and what devices forcing ASPM actually changes. If If you find that you have improved power consumption from something it's better to ask Lenovo to change the defaults in their BIOS. They're more well equipped to do stress testing and analysis that PCIe is still performing properly using the proper equipment. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
