On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 07:04:21PM -0800, David E. Box wrote: > This series adds support for Intel Software Defined Silicon. These > patches are the same as patches 4-6 from this series [1]. Patches 1-3 > of that series were pulled in during the 5.17 merge window. > > David E. Box (3): > platform/x86: Add Intel Software Defined Silicon driver > tools arch x86: Add Intel SDSi provisioning tool > selftests: sdsi: test sysfs setup > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211216023146.2361174-1-david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/ > > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel_sdsi | 77 +++ > MAINTAINERS | 7 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel/Kconfig | 12 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel/Makefile | 2 + > drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c | 571 ++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec.c | 12 +- > tools/arch/x86/intel_sdsi/Makefile | 9 + > tools/arch/x86/intel_sdsi/sdsi.c | 540 +++++++++++++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/drivers/sdsi/sdsi.sh | 18 + > .../selftests/drivers/sdsi/sdsi_test.py | 226 +++++++ > 10 files changed, 1473 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-intel_sdsi > create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c > create mode 100644 tools/arch/x86/intel_sdsi/Makefile > create mode 100644 tools/arch/x86/intel_sdsi/sdsi.c > create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/sdsi/sdsi.sh > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/sdsi/sdsi_test.py > > -- > 2.25.1 > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
