Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: think-lmi: Prevent underflow in index_store()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Dan

On 2021-12-17 02:12, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> There needs to be a check to prevent negative offsets for
> setting->index.  I have reviewed this code and I think that the
> "if (block->instance_count <= instance)" check in __query_block() will
> prevent this from resulting in an out of bounds access.  But it's
> still worth fixing.
> 
> Fixes: 640a5fa50a42 ("platform/x86: think-lmi: Opcode support")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> index 27ab8e4e5b83..0b73e16cccea 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static ssize_t index_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	if (val > TLMI_INDEX_MAX)
> +	if (val < 0 || val > TLMI_INDEX_MAX)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	setting->index = val;
> 
Agreed, it's good to have this check.
Thank you
Mark



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux