On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 08:57:07PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If 'led_classdev_register()' fails, some additional resources should be
> released.
>
> Add the missing 'i8042_remove_filter()' and 'lis3lv02d_remove_fs()' calls
> that are already in the remove function but are missing here.
>
> Fixes: a4c724d0723b ("platform: hp_accel: add a i8042 filter to remove HPQ6000 data from kb bus stream")
> Fixes: 9e0c79782143 ("lis3lv02d: merge with leds hp disk")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c b/drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c
> index b183967ecfb7..435a91fe2568 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c
> @@ -331,9 +331,11 @@ static int lis3lv02d_probe(struct platform_device *device)
adding some lines of context:
326 /* filter to remove HPQ6000 accelerometer data
327 * from keyboard bus stream */
328 if (strstr(dev_name(&device->dev), "HPQ6000"))
329 i8042_install_filter(hp_accel_i8042_filter);
330
> INIT_WORK(&hpled_led.work, delayed_set_status_worker);
> ret = led_classdev_register(NULL, &hpled_led.led_classdev);
> if (ret) {
> + i8042_remove_filter(hp_accel_i8042_filter);
This filter was added under a conditional. Should it not be removed under a
similar conditional?
> lis3lv02d_joystick_disable(&lis3_dev);
> lis3lv02d_poweroff(&lis3_dev);
> flush_work(&hpled_led.work);
> + lis3lv02d_remove_fs(&lis3_dev);
where was the fs ever added?
--mark
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
