https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204807 --- Comment #154 from Eugene Shalygin (eugene.shalygin@xxxxxxxxx) --- (In reply to Olli Asikainen from comment #153) > Yeah, it's old and suffers from the same bug, but I reckon supporting this > would be a completely different story. Thanks for your answer Eugene and > sorry for the noise. This firmware seem to be using ACPI mutex named \_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.SIO1.MUT0 to guard access to the nct chip registers. I wonder, can we rely on these mutexes, whose names seem to be quite stable, as well, instead of the WMI functions? Then accessing nct registers would become simpler: lock ACPI mutex if needed, access registers always in the regular way, unlock the mutex. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
