On 10/29/21, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't think this interface makes any sense at all for something off of > which to base firmware updates. It's just too noisy. > > That said, I *do* think we are going to need something similar to what > you propose here because folks are going to want to target memory > allocations to NUMA nodes that have encryption capabilities. And how do think we should approach this? Putting apart the TME part, ie, this patch as it is (but showing the file for every node), what do think it's the next step?
