On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:03 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:33 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > + if (!soc_intel_is_byt() && !soc_intel_is_cht()) > > if (!(soc_intel_is_byt() || soc_intel_is_cht())) > > ? Self-nak on this. && is slightly better in case we got the first argument false. Proposed variant will always evaluate both. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko