Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 17/38] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/25/21 6:06 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:

I really meant putting the beginning of that string at the very first
position on the line:

                 if (WARN(hdr->end_entry > end_entry || cur_entry > hdr->cur_entry,
"SEV-SNP: PSC processing going backward, end_entry %d (got %d) cur_entry %d (got %d)\n",
                          end_entry, hdr->end_entry, cur_entry, hdr->cur_entry)) {

Exactly like this!


Noted.

...

+static void set_page_state(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned int npages, int op)
+{
+	unsigned long vaddr_end, next_vaddr;
+	struct snp_psc_desc *desc;
+
+	vaddr = vaddr & PAGE_MASK;
+	vaddr_end = vaddr + (npages << PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+	desc = kmalloc(sizeof(*desc), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);

And again, from previous review:

kzalloc() so that you don't have to memset() later in
__set_page_state().


I replied to your previous comment. Depending on the npages value, the __set_page_state() will be called multiple times and on each call it needs to clear desc before populate it. So, I do not see strong reason to use kzalloc() during the desc allocation. I thought you were okay with that explanation.


+	if (!desc)
+		panic("SEV-SNP: failed to alloc memory for PSC descriptor\n");

"allocate" fits just fine too.


Noted.

thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux