Hi, On 6/29/21 10:47 AM, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: > Currently amd_pmc_dump_registers() routine is being called at > multiple places. The best to call it is after command submission > to SMU. > > Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx> > --- > v2: split into multiple patches as suggested by Hans > v3: No change > v4: No change > v5: No change Thanks, patch looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Hans > > drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c > index b1d6175a13b2..e5107e3b1911 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c > @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ static int amd_pmc_send_cmd(struct amd_pmc_dev *dev, bool set) > > out_unlock: > mutex_unlock(&dev->lock); > + amd_pmc_dump_registers(dev); > return rc; > } > > @@ -194,7 +195,6 @@ static int __maybe_unused amd_pmc_suspend(struct device *dev) > if (rc) > dev_err(pdev->dev, "suspend failed\n"); > > - amd_pmc_dump_registers(pdev); > return 0; > } > > @@ -207,7 +207,6 @@ static int __maybe_unused amd_pmc_resume(struct device *dev) > if (rc) > dev_err(pdev->dev, "resume failed\n"); > > - amd_pmc_dump_registers(pdev); > return 0; > } > > @@ -279,8 +278,6 @@ static int amd_pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!dev->regbase) > return -ENOMEM; > > - amd_pmc_dump_registers(dev); > - > mutex_init(&dev->lock); > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev); > amd_pmc_dbgfs_register(dev); >
