Hi, On 5/21/21 5:55 PM, Mark Pearson wrote: <snip> >>> I know it would make Dell and Lenovo operate differently (I can add >>> that detail to the documentation) but it just feels like a nicer >>> design. >> >> That works for me. Perhaps you can also do a (compile tested only) >> RFC patch for the Dell code to do the same thing (replace the memset >> 0 with the strscpy) to see if the Dell folks are ok with also doing >> things this way ? >> > I'm not hugely comfortable with that. If for some reason it broke things > for Dell customers I wouldn't want to be responsible :) Right, that is why I suggested making it a RFC patch and I would certainly not apply that patch without it being tested by Dell first. The idea behind the patch is for it to be a way to get a discussion about this started. In my experience patches tend to get more of a reaction then hypothetical discussions about changes :) > I'd rather they > made the changes and were able to test it - I know that's what I'd > prefer if it was the other way around. Apologies if I'm being over cautious! If you don't feel comfortable doing this, that is fine, lets wait what the Dell folks have to say; and if they don't respond I might do a RFC myself. > I've added the new Dell kernel group email to the thread so they're aware :) Thanks. Regards, Hans
