On 3/26/21 1:28 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
The "&client->ddev->lock" and "&ddev->lock" are the same thing. Let's
use "&ddev->lock" consistently.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Good catch, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c
index 1fedacf74050..63ce587e79e3 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static ssize_t surface_dtx_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t coun
if (status < 0)
return status;
- if (down_read_killable(&client->ddev->lock))
+ if (down_read_killable(&ddev->lock))
return -ERESTARTSYS;
/* Need to check that we're not shut down again. */
