On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 9:53 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:33 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1/26/21 6:14 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:55 PM Patrik Jakobsson > > > <patrik.r.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:51 PM Andy Shevchenko > > >> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 5:25 PM Patrik Jakobsson > > >>> <patrik.r.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:37 PM Andy Shevchenko > > >>>> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi guys, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This is first part of Intel MID outdated platforms removal. It's collected into > > >>>>> immutable branch with a given tag, please pull to yours subsystems. > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi Andy, > > >>>> Do you plan on eventually removing X86_INTEL_MID completely? If so, > > >>>> then I should probably start looking at removing the corresponding > > >>>> parts in GMA500. > > >>> > > >>> Nope. It is related to only Medfield / Clovertrail platforms. > > >>> > > >>> There are other (MID) platforms that may / might utilize this driver > > >>> in the future. > > >> > > >> Right, there's still Oaktrail / Moorestown with hardware in the wild. > > > > > > Actually Moorestown had to be removed a few years ago (kernel won't > > > boot on them anyway from that date when Alan removed support under > > > arch/x86 for it). Ok. I lump Moorestown and Oaktrail together since they have the same Z6xx series CPU/GPU (GMA600). I still have a working Oaktrail device so that support should stay in gma500. > > > > > > I'm talking about Merrifield and Moorefield that can utilize it and > > > also some other platforms that are not SFI based (Cedar something... > > > IIRC). > > > > Yes at least there are some 64 bit capable SoCs with GMA500 which were > > used in NAS like devices. These NAS-es actually have a VGA output > > (and maybe also DVI?) which is attached to the GMA500. Yes these should be Cedarview/Cedartrail. Some of them are 64-bit and some are 32-bit. I think it came down to if bios enabled it or not. Cedarview comes with VGA, DVI and eDP/DP. Quite a few Cedarview devices exist in the wild. > > Since you are talking about 64-bit, definitely they are *not* > Moorestown, Medfield, Clovertrail since the mentioned never were > 64-bit. But it would be nice to see the CPU model number to be sure. > > > I know people are running Fedora on these, so we should at least keep > > these supported. > > Is it possible to gather the CPU model number from them? (Or at least > the exact device/box name) Yes, it would be interesting to know more about Clovertrail. gma500 only supports up to the Cedarview GPUs but Clovertrail might also use a Cedarview GPU. -Patrik
