Re: [PATCH v2 19/24] platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: fix checkpatch warnings, more consistent style

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/14/21 2:22 AM, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> Fix (almost all) checkpatch warnings. Reorder variable definitions from
> longest to shortest. Add more whitespaces for better readability. Rename
> variables named `ret` to `err` where appropriate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Pőcze <pobrn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> @@ -265,30 +280,40 @@ static int debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
>  
>  	if (!read_ec_data(priv->adev->handle, VPCCMD_R_BL_MAX, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "Backlight max:\t%lu\n", value);
> +
>  	if (!read_ec_data(priv->adev->handle, VPCCMD_R_BL, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "Backlight now:\t%lu\n", value);
> +
>  	if (!read_ec_data(priv->adev->handle, VPCCMD_R_BL_POWER, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "BL power value:\t%s (%lu)\n", value ? "on" : "off", value);
> +
>  	seq_puts(s, "=====================\n");
>  
>  	if (!read_ec_data(priv->adev->handle, VPCCMD_R_RF, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "Radio status:\t%s (%lu)\n", value ? "on" : "off", value);
> +
>  	if (!read_ec_data(priv->adev->handle, VPCCMD_R_WIFI, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "Wifi status:\t%s (%lu)\n", value ? "on" : "off", value);
> +
>  	if (!read_ec_data(priv->adev->handle, VPCCMD_R_BT, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "BT status:\t%s (%lu)\n", value ? "on" : "off", value);
> +
>  	if (!read_ec_data(priv->adev->handle, VPCCMD_R_3G, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "3G status:\t%s (%lu)\n", value ? "on" : "off", value);
> +
>  	seq_puts(s, "=====================\n");
>  
>  	if (!read_ec_data(priv->adev->handle, VPCCMD_R_TOUCHPAD, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "Touchpad status:\t%s (%lu)\n", value ? "on" : "off", value);
> +
>  	if (!read_ec_data(priv->adev->handle, VPCCMD_R_CAMERA, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "Camera status:\t%s (%lu)\n", value ? "on" : "off", value);
> +
>  	seq_puts(s, "=====================\n");
>  
>  	if (!eval_gbmd(priv->adev->handle, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "GBMD: %#010lx\n", value);
> +
>  	if (!eval_hals(priv->adev->handle, &value))
>  		seq_printf(s, "HALS: %#010lx\n", value);
>  

checkpatch.pl suggests empty lines? I think they are doing the same thing. It's better
to put them tightly.

--
Ike



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux