On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 03:39:19PM -0500, Mike Travis wrote:
> Make a small symbol change (is_uv() ==> is_uv_sys()) to accommodate a
> change in the uv_mmrs.h file (is_uv() is the new arch selector function).
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h | 8 ++++----
> drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_main.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp_uv.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_main.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_partition.c | 2 +-
> drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpnet.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h
> index 06469b12aced..0af267baf031 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h
> +++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xp.h
> @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@
>
> #if defined CONFIG_X86_UV || defined CONFIG_IA64_SGI_UV
> #include <asm/uv/uv.h>
> -#define is_uv() is_uv_system()
> +#define is_uv_sys() is_uv_system()
Do I see it correctly that you can simply use is_uv_system() directly
instead of this macro indirection?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
