Hi Greg,
On 24/3/20 17:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 05:31:10PM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Many thanks for your quick answer, some comments below.
>>
>> On 22/3/20 12:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>>>> This driver attaches to the ChromeOS ACPI device and then exports the values
>>>> reported by the ACPI in a sysfs directory. The ACPI values are presented in
>>>> the string form (numbers as decimal values) or binary blobs, and can be
>>>> accessed as the contents of the appropriate read only files in the sysfs
>>>> directory tree originating in /sys/devices/platform/chromeos_acpi.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> What is wrong with the "default" ACPI sysfs access? Why do you need a
>>> special driver just for this specific ACPI firmware?
>>>
>>
>> Please correct me if I am wrong, as I'm not an ACPI expert and I probably have
>> some ACPI leaks and misunderstandings.
>>
>> What is exporting this driver is the attributes for the non-default Chromebook
>> specific MLST ACPI method. Hence, I assumed we needed a special driver to expose
>> these values that can't be done using "default" ACPI sysfs. Note that these
>> attributes are dynamically created and are different between Chromebooks so need
>> some parsing.
>>
>> I didn't find a "standard" way to expose these attributes to userspace, so,
>> please kindly point me to one if there is one.
>
> Are you sure they aren't already there under /sys/firmware/acpi/? I
> thought all tables and methods were exported there with no need to do
> anything special.
>
That's the first I did when I started to forward port this patch from chromeos
kernel to mainline.
On my system I get:
/sys/firmware/acpi/tables#
APIC DSDT FACP FACS HPET MCFG SSDT data dynamic
(data and dynamic are empty directories)
I quickly concluded (maybe wrong) that as there is no a MLST entry it was not
exported, but maybe one of those already contains the info? Or, should I expect
a MLST entry here?
> What makes these attributes "special" from any other ACPI method?
>
I can't answer this question right now. I need to investigate more I guess ;-)
Thanks again for your answer,
Enric
>>>> +static int __init chromeos_acpi_init(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + chromeos_acpi.pdev = platform_device_register_simple("chromeos_acpi",
>>>> + PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, NULL, 0);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(chromeos_acpi.pdev)) {
>>>> + pr_err("unable to register chromeos_acpi platform device\n");
>>>> + return PTR_ERR(chromeos_acpi.pdev);
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> Only use platform devices and drivers for things that are actually
>>> platform devices and drivers. That's not what this is, it is an ACPI
>>> device and driver. Don't abuse the platform interface please.
>>>
>>
>> Ok. The purpose was to not break ChromeOS userspace since is looking for the
>> attributes inside /sys/devices/platform/chromeos_acpi. Not a good reason, I
>> know, and I assume we will need to change userspace instead, and convert this to
>> a ACPI device and driver only, right?
>
> How can any userspace be looking for anything that hasn't been submitted
> before? That's nothing to worry about, we don't have to support things
> like that :)
>
>> I'll investigate the different places in userspace where this is used and see
>> how difficult it is to do the changes.
>
> Look at /sys/firmware/acpi/ first please.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
