Re: [PATCH v10 05/10] test_firmware: add support for firmware_request_platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 1/6/20 10:33 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:51:12PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Add support for testing firmware_request_platform through a new
trigger_request_platform trigger.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/test_firmware.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_firmware.c b/lib/test_firmware.c
index 251213c872b5..9af00cfc8979 100644
--- a/lib/test_firmware.c
+++ b/lib/test_firmware.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
  #include <linux/delay.h>
  #include <linux/kthread.h>
  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/efi_embedded_fw.h>
#define TEST_FIRMWARE_NAME "test-firmware.bin"
  #define TEST_FIRMWARE_NUM_REQS	4
@@ -507,12 +508,76 @@ static ssize_t trigger_request_store(struct device *dev,
  }
  static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(trigger_request);
+#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_EMBEDDED_FIRMWARE
+static ssize_t trigger_request_platform_store(struct device *dev,
+					      struct device_attribute *attr,
+					      const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+	static const u8 test_data[] = {
+		0x55, 0xaa, 0x55, 0xaa, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04,
+		0x55, 0xaa, 0x55, 0xaa, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08,
+		0x55, 0xaa, 0x55, 0xaa, 0x10, 0x20, 0x30, 0x40,
+		0x55, 0xaa, 0x55, 0xaa, 0x50, 0x60, 0x70, 0x80
+	};
+	struct efi_embedded_fw fw;
+	int rc;
+	char *name;
+
+	name = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!name)
+		return -ENOSPC;
+
+	pr_info("inserting test platform fw '%s'\n", name);
+	fw.name = name;
+	fw.data = (void *)test_data;
+	fw.length = sizeof(test_data);
+	list_add(&fw.list, &efi_embedded_fw_list);
+
+	pr_info("loading '%s'\n", name);
+
+	mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex);
+	release_firmware(test_firmware);
+	test_firmware = NULL;

Seems odd to have the above two lines here before the request, why not
after as noted below.

I modelled this after trigger_request_store which keeps the
test_firmware around after it has been called so that its contents can be
read back from the char misc device which the test_firmware module registers.

Since e.g. trigger_request_store which keeps the test_firmware around
we must check and free it before assigning a new firmware to it using
firmware_request_platform, which is why this is done before and not
after the request.


+	rc = firmware_request_platform(&test_firmware, name, dev);
+	if (rc) {
+		pr_info("load of '%s' failed: %d\n", name, rc);
+		goto out;
+	}
+	if (test_firmware->size != sizeof(test_data) ||
+	    memcmp(test_firmware->data, test_data, sizeof(test_data)) != 0) {
+		pr_info("firmware contents mismatch for '%s'\n", name);
+		rc = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+	pr_info("loaded: %zu\n", test_firmware->size);
+	rc = count;

Here.

+
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex);
+
+	list_del(&fw.list);
+	kfree(name);
+
+	return rc;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(trigger_request_platform);
+#endif
+
  static DECLARE_COMPLETION(async_fw_done);
static void trigger_async_request_cb(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
  {
  	test_firmware = fw;
  	complete(&async_fw_done);
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
  }

Ummm, new empty lines without any code added... did you forget
something?  Please address this.

This is a left over from an earlier version of the patch, my bad, I will remove
this and send out a new version.

Regards,

Hans




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux