On Monday, September 9, 2019 10:15:44 AM CEST Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > These series implement "references" properties for software nodes as true > properties, instead of managing them completely separately. > > The first 10 patches are generic cleanups and consolidation and unification > of the existing code; patch #11 implements PROPERTY_EMTRY_REF() and friends; > patch #12 converts the user of references to the property syntax, and patch > #13 removes the remains of references as entities that are managed > separately. > > Changes in v3: > - added various cleanups before implementing reference properties > > Changes in v2: > - reworked code so that even single-entry reference properties are > stored as arrays (i.e. the software_node_ref_args instances are > not part of property_entry structure) to avoid size increase. > From user's POV nothing is changed, one can still use PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF > macro to define reference "inline". > - dropped unused DEV_PROP_MAX > - rebased on linux-next > > Dmitry Torokhov (13): > software node: remove DEV_PROP_MAX > software node: clean up property_copy_string_array() > software node: get rid of property_set_pointer() > software node: simplify property_get_pointer() > software node: remove property_entry_read_uNN_array functions > software node: unify PROPERTY_ENTRY_XXX macros > software node: simplify property_entry_read_string_array() > software node: introduce PROPERTY_ENTRY_ARRAY_XXX_LEN() > efi/apple-properties: use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8_ARRAY_LEN > software node: rename is_array to is_inline > software node: implement reference properties > platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: use inline reference properties > software node: remove separate handling of references > > drivers/base/swnode.c | 243 +++++++---------------- > drivers/firmware/efi/apple-properties.c | 8 +- > drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c | 81 ++++---- > include/linux/property.h | 154 +++++++------- > 4 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 288 deletions(-) I think that this is still relevant, so can you please resend it with a CC to linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx? It would be much easier to handle for me then.
