On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:20:21AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 17-09-2019 21:45, Yauhen Kharuzhy wrote: > > Existing intel_cht_int33fe ACPI pseudo-device driver assumes that > > hardware has TypeC connector and register related devices described as > > I2C connections in the _CRS resource. > > > > There is at least one hardware (Lenovo Yoga Book YB1-91L/F) with micro > > USB B connector exists. It has INT33FE device in the DSDT table but > > there are only two I2C connection described: PMIC and BQ27452 battery > > fuel gauge. > > > > Splitting existing INT33FE driver allow to maintain code for USB type B > > (AB) connector variant separately and make it simpler. > > > > Split driver to intel_cht_int33fe_common.c and > > intel_cht_int33fe_{typeb,typec}.c. Compile all this source to one .ko > > module to make user experience easier. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy <jekhor@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thank you for doing this, this version looks much better IMHO. > > Note that this does not apply to Linus' current master, please > rebase. Specifically this conflicts with this patch: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=78cd4bf53635d3aeb73435bc89eb6eb39450f315 > > Which just got merged. Instead of rebasing on Linus' master > (which is always a bit adventurous to use during the merge window) > you can also cherry-pick that single commit on top of v5.3 > and use that as a base. > > Note that that patch makes changes to struct cht_int33fe_data > specifically it drops the: > > struct fwnode_handle *mux; > > Member, so when rebasing you should drop that in the new > version of the struct on common.h . > > Besides that this need a rebase, overall this looks good, I have some > small remarks inline: Arghh.. OK, I have rebased the patch but at current torvalds kernel i2c_acpi_new_device() fails with -EPROBE_DEFER at my hw, so I cannot check if it is fully working. But I will resend patch anyway soon, this error should not be related to the patch content. > > + data->hw_type = ret; > > + data->dev = dev; > > + > > + switch (data->hw_type) { > > I suggested adding hw_type to data so that it could be used to > select the right remove function in cht_int33fe_remove(), > since you are using a remove function pointer in data for this > (which is fine), there is no reason to store hw_type in > cht_int33fe_data anymore, please drop this and change the > > switch (data->hw_type) { > > to: > > switch (ret) { OK, sure > > p.s. > > I've done the rebase myself and I'm building a kernel with my re-based version of this > patch to test it on a typec device. I will get back to you with the results > (I expect things will just work, just making sure). > -- Yauhen Kharuzhy