Hi,
On 18-08-19 15:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:18:22AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 12-08-19 15:53, Linus Walleij wrote:
Anyways, this will need to be fixed before we can merge this.
It might affect the behaviour of pinctrl-baytrail as well.
Hans, do you have any Baytrail at hand to test latest linux-next, or take my
for-next branch from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pinctrl/intel.git?
Given all the hw-enablement work I've done for BYT/CHT I have a whole
stack of Bay Trail devices. Is there anything specific you want me to
test? Or should I just take the first one of the stack which uses a
GPIO from the SoC as IRQ for something and then test that something?
Linus, shall I postpone Baytrail patch as well?
Unlike the INT0002 virtual GPIO driver changes this one does not seem
to move anything to a later point in time...
Regards,
Hans
