On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 17:28 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:00 AM Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 18:07 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Pushed first 8 to my review and testing queue, thanks! > > > > Thank you. > > > > Looking at kbuild bot errors, it seems I managed to somehow mess up > > again. It is not true that just the [08/10] patch relies on the > > psy-olpc-1.75-battery-signed branch of power-supply tree (see above); > > in fact [03/10] also does on x86. > > > > Would it be possible to include that branch in your testing as well? It > > is going to be included in the power-supply pull for 5.2. > > Still some warnings. > Unfortunately there is no time to push to this cycle and test, so, > I'll withdraw them from my queue. > > > Also, it seems patches [09/10] and [10/10] landed in your queue; they > > are not ready. > > I didn't pull them in the last attempt. Thank you; even though this doesn't make 5.2 the tests that run against your review branch were useful and uncovered bugs. Some are against the olpc_battery branch -- I've sent the fix to power-supply maintainer and pm-linux list already. They're now being reported somewhat redundantly, please drop the patches from your branch or replace it with ones I'll submit shortly. > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko Thank you Lubo
