On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:54:19AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:42 PM Heikki Krogerus > <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This is the third version of my proposal to add reference handling to > > the software node code. In this version I renamed ACPI_NAME_SIZE to > > ACPI_NAMESEG_SIZE in 6/13, and slit patch 9/13 in two separate patches > > (9/13 and 10/13) as suggested by Andy. Patch 9/13 will now only move > > the registration of max17047 out of probe, and 10/13 will introduce > > the software nodes. > > > > v2 commit message: > > > > This is the second version of this series. In this version I'm > > introducing a new helper device_find_child_by_name() as proposed > > by Andy. Andy requested also another helper that could be used for > > chaining the fwnodes, but I decided not to add that now. I would like > > to still think about how we should handle exceptions like if there > > already is a secondary node assigned for a node. > > > > v1 commit message: > > > > This series adds support for software fwnode reference handling. In > > practice it means making fwnode_property_get_reference_args() function > > usable in the drivers also with software nodes. I send the series > > originally as RFC [1]. > > > > As the first user for the software node references, I'm converting > > intel_cht_int33fe.c to use them as part of the series. > > > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/15/457 > > I added this series to the bleeding-edge branch last night and it > triggered some warnings from various checkers and there was a breakage > report from Hans. All of that needs to be fixed IMO, so I'm expecting > an update. I'm on it. thanks, -- heikki
