Hi Rafael,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 06:24:59PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> There is no reason why we should limit the use of
> fwnode_get_named_child_node() to data nodes only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/property.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> index 77abe0ec4043..c3fb52c387a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> @@ -602,15 +602,29 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *
> acpi_fwnode_get_named_child_node(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> const char *childname)
> {
> + char name[ACPI_PATH_SEGMENT_LENGTH];
> struct fwnode_handle *child;
> + struct acpi_buffer path;
> + acpi_status status;
>
> - /*
> - * Find first matching named child node of this fwnode.
> - * For ACPI this will be a data only sub-node.
> - */
> - fwnode_for_each_child_node(fwnode, child)
> - if (acpi_data_node_match(child, childname))
> + path.length = sizeof(name);
> + path.pointer = name;
> +
> + fwnode_for_each_child_node(fwnode, child) {
> + if (is_acpi_data_node(child)) {
> + if (acpi_data_node_match(child, childname))
> + return child;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + status = acpi_get_name(ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(child),
> + ACPI_SINGLE_NAME, &path);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + break;
> +
> + if (!strncmp(name, childname, ACPI_NAME_SIZE))
I rebased these on of todays linux-next, and noticed that Bob renamed
ACPI_NAME_SIZE to ACPI_NAMESEG_SIZE in commit 3278675567df ("ACPICA:
Rename nameseg length macro/define for clarity").
I'll fix that and resend these tomorrow.
thanks,
--
heikki
