Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Use BIT() macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/10/19 6:59 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 08:39:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:07:35AM -0700, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote:
On 4/9/19 4:25 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Use BIT() and BIT_MASK() macros for definitions.
Looks good to me.
Thanks!
If you have no further comments, can you provide your tag here?
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

   /* PMC register bit definitions */
   /* PMC_CFG_REG bit masks */
-#define PMC_CFG_NO_REBOOT_MASK		(1 << 4)
+#define PMC_CFG_NO_REBOOT_MASK		BIT_MASK(4)
   #define PMC_CFG_NO_REBOOT_EN		(1 << 4)
   #define PMC_CFG_NO_REBOOT_DIS		(0 << 4)
Do we need 0 << 4 ?
Yes, to explicitly show that this is a value for NO_REBOOT masked bit(s)
(single bit in this case).

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux kernel developer




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux