On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 06:47:32AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 07:44:18AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > My fd/inode knowledge is lacking, to say the least. Whatever works, so > > long as we have a way to uniquely identify enclaves. > > I will simply trial and error :-) I think it should work since it does > own an address space, but yeah, testing will tell. We can go also with > anon inode if required. I think this can be concluded with the fact that it is nice to be able to multiplex the dev fd. That is the key reason for using anon inode. You KVM comment locks the decision here. /Jarkko
