On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:15 PM Florian Eckert <fe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Andy, > > Thank you very very much for your code review "again" I will update my > patch set with your hints. > Should I send v6 or should i wait till I get feedback from you about > ACPI? > > >> > >> Until now it was not possible to get more information to detect the > >> MMIO_BASE address from the ACPI subsystem. > > > > I'm sorry if I already asked, please, remind me where dump of ACPI > > tables can be found? > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2887290.html Unfortunately the file had been removed. Btw, is the statement in above email still actual? "...I can fix required things." > > Also would be nice to have the output of `lspci -nk -vv -xxx` on such > > platform. > 00:14.3 0601: 1022:780e (rev 11) > Subsystem: 1022:780e > Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle+ MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- > Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- > Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- > <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx- > Latency: 0 > 00: 22 10 0e 78 0f 00 20 02 11 00 01 06 00 00 80 00 > 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 22 10 0e 78 > 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 40: 04 00 00 00 d5 ff 03 ff 07 ff 20 00 00 00 00 00 > 50: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 60: 00 00 00 00 00 0e 10 00 0e 00 0f 00 00 ff ff ff > 70: 67 45 23 00 00 00 00 00 90 00 00 00 05 0a 00 00 > 80: 08 00 03 a8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > a0: 02 00 c1 fe 2f 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 e9 3d 00 00 00 00 > c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 47 10 82 ff > d0: 86 ff ff 08 42 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Thanks. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
